Editorial Scope
YOLKMEET editorial policy starts with a reader problem, then records source URLs, source notes, decision criteria, caveats, and an update policy. We prioritize official documentation, public product pages, and reproducible workflow evidence over broad unsupported claims.
Accepted article formats include operator checklists, workflow walkthroughs, troubleshooting guides, comparison notes, source-backed tool explanations, and reporting or site-operations reviews. Articles should answer a practical question before expanding into background context.
Originality And Source Use
Competitor pages may be used for market research, search intent mapping, and format benchmarking, but their article bodies are not copied into publishable drafts.
AI-assisted drafts are reviewed for usefulness, copied-body risk, unsupported claims, internal links, corrections, and review status before publication. We avoid fake freshness, invented citations, and claims of firsthand testing unless a real test artifact exists.
Template structure is allowed only when it helps readers compare similar operating decisions. The final article still needs specific examples, source notes, practical caveats, and a clear reason the page exists beyond matching a keyword.
Corrections And Updates
When a material error is found, we review the source, update the article, and keep the update log visible where the article template supports it.
Fast-changing pages, especially pricing, product policy, search documentation, analytics behavior, and WordPress release details, should be refreshed sooner than evergreen operational checklists. Corrections can be sent to editor@yolkmeet.com.